The case files in this section were chosen because they are the best documented: prospective hospital studies, laboratory tests, cases investigated by researchers with records in hand. That makes them the fairest test of the question. It also makes them a very small sample. Most reports of seeing something true while out of the body never came near a study. They happened at home, on the road, in a crib, at sea, and they were told afterwards to a nurse, a spouse, a doctor or a book.
One person's story proves very little. But there are a great many of these stories, they come from people with no reason to coordinate, and some of them were confirmed by someone else. This page collects twenty of the strongest. Each one gets its source, what was perceived, who confirmed it, when it was written down, and its weak point. The weak points matter: this is testimony, not experiment, and it should be read that way. It is also too much testimony to wave away.
Two people have tried to count.
Janice Miner Holden (2009). In The Handbook of Near-Death Experiences (Praeger, 2009), Holden gathered 107 published cases of apparent veridical perception during near-death experiences, the oldest from 1882. By her count, 37 per cent were completely accurate and confirmed by someone other than the experiencer, such as a doctor, a relative or a record. Another 55 per cent were completely accurate by the experiencer's own report. About 6 per cent contained some error, and roughly one case was entirely wrong. The often-quoted "92 per cent accurate" is those first two figures added together. The fair criticism, made by Andrew Paquette in the Journal of Scientific Exploration (2012), is that very few of the 107 were interviewed within days of the event.
Jeffrey Long (2010). Long, who founded NDERF, went through 617 consecutive accounts submitted between October 2004 and October 2008. In Evidence of the Afterlife (HarperOne, 2010), chapter 4, he reports that 287 described real-world events that could in principle be checked, and that 280 of those contained nothing unrealistic. Sixty-five people said they had checked their observations afterwards, and none reported an error. Read those numbers carefully: "realistic" means nothing in the account was implausible, not that anyone verified it, and the 65 checks are the experiencers' own say-so. What the figures do show is the scale. Out of a few hundred ordinary submissions, nearly half include a claim about the physical world.
Rivas, Dirven and Smit (2016). The Self Does Not Die (IANDS, 2016; second edition 2023) is the most demanding collection. A case is only admitted if someone other than the experiencer confirmed the paranormal element, in writing or on record. More than a hundred cases passed. Several are below.
Monroe's Journeys Out of the Body (1971), chapter 3, "On the Evidence", logs four visits he checked by phone or in person within days. He visited a sick friend and found him outdoors instead, in a light overcoat and hat. He saw a man loading an odd machine into a car, which turned out to be a Van de Graaff generator. And he pinched a colleague on holiday, who later showed him "two brown and blue marks at exactly the spot." The details, and their weaknesses, are on his page. Their strength is that they were deliberate: Monroe set out to see something, wrote down what he saw, then checked. Their weakness is that he is the only witness to the first half.
In 1993 Kenneth Ring and Madelaine Lawrence published three short cases in the Journal of Near-Death Studies ("Further Evidence for Veridical Perception During Near-Death Experiences", 11(4), 223 to 229), each reported by a nurse or social worker who was involved.
The same paper is honest about the genre. It reveals that one of the most famous cases in circulation, Larry Dossey's "blind Sarah" (Recovering the Soul, 1989), was a composite that Dossey constructed. That case should never be cited, and we don't.
Cardiologist Michael Sabom began as a skeptic. In Recollections of Death (Harper and Row, 1982) he interviewed 32 cardiac patients who said they had watched their own resuscitation, and compared them with 25 cardiac patients without NDEs who were asked to imagine theirs. Most of the comparison group made major errors. One of his subjects, a retired Air Force pilot, described the defibrillator meter as "square and had two needles on there, one fixed and one which moved," and the moving needle climbing in stages as the machine charged (pages 99 to 101). That is a detail you would only know by watching the machine charge. Weak point: a pilot reads gauges for a living, the interview came five years after the arrest, and Susan Blackmore argued that patients drifting in and out of consciousness pick up cues the comparison group never had.
In October 1863 Mr. S. R. Wilmot was crossing from Liverpool to New York through a nine-day storm. At home in Watertown, Connecticut, his wife lay awake worrying, and felt that she crossed the sea, found a low black steamer, went into his stateroom, saw a man in the upper berth, kissed her husband and left. On board, Wilmot dreamed exactly that visit. His bunkmate, who was awake, teased him the next morning about the woman who had come in. When Wilmot got home, his wife asked whether he had received "a visit", and described the stateroom correctly. The case was investigated for the Society for Psychical Research and published in its Proceedings in 1891 (volume 7). Weak point: it was written down 26 years later, the bunkmate was dead by then, and all three accounts ultimately come through Mr. Wilmot.
A different kind of veridical claim. In a 2010 paper ("Seeing Dead People Not Known to Have Died", Anthropology and Humanism 35(2), 159 to 171), the psychiatrist Bruce Greyson collected cases in which an experiencer met a person they did not know was dead. In the University of Virginia's collection, about one NDE in five includes meeting a deceased person. Most are people already known to be dead. A few are not:
Put the two halves of this section side by side and a pattern appears. The controlled tests are clean, and so far they are almost empty: no hospital study has produced a hit on a hidden visual target. The accounts are messy, and there are hundreds of them, many with oddly specific details confirmed by someone who was there. Skeptics read the gap as the signature of memory, coincidence and storytelling, which flourish without controls and vanish with them. Researchers like Holden read it the other way: veridical perception is spontaneous and rare, and a shelf in a hospital ward is a poor net for catching it.
Neither side has settled it. What the record does not support is the claim that there is nothing to explain. If you want to judge for yourself, read the primary sources below, apply the five tests, and remember that a story's weak point is no reason to stop reading. It tells you how much weight the story can carry.
Know a case with a real paper trail? Send it through the contribute page, with the source.
No account needed. You'll post as Anonymous Coward, and that ID stays the same for you on this thread.